Listed below are the liens/RIDs that were found at the PDS/PSA February 2016 review of the Prelanding thru Escort 1 phases of the Rosetta mission. Even though this particular data set may have not participated in the review, it uses the same pipeline and so the liens likely apply here as well. Please take note that some issues may be resolved, while others are not. If any other issues are discovered please let the PDS-SBN know. It is expected that a fully lien resolved version will be produced during post mission ops and archived with an incremented data set version number. 1)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-ALICE-1-EQ Dataset: All Location: Documentation Title: PSF missing Description: "No predicted line shapes or PSF computation. No computed spectra. Details: It is not provided the PSF (Point Spread Function). The PSF changes along the slit and changes with wavelength. It might be necessary this information for some analysis of the data. " Proposed Solution to Reviewer: It would be useful to add this information in the documentation or in a file. Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: The team will study if this information can be added. 2)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-ALICE-2-EQ Dataset: All Location: Documentation Title: Artefact around 800 A Description: The data show an artefact around 800 nm in many spectra. It would be interesting to provide some detail and flag the spectral range that is affected. Proposed Solution to Reviewer: It would be useful to add this information in the documentation or in a file. Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: The team will study if this information can be added. 3)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-ALICE-102-CG Dataset: ALL Location: Calibration folder Title: number of elements in Effective Area correction files Description: The effective area file, with 668 elements, does not correspond in size with the series of “effective area corrections” files, which have 1024 elements each. Proposed Solution to Reviewer: It should be described somewhere (perhaps in the EAICD) how these “effective area corrections” are applied. Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: The team gives an explanation (there are interpolations). The instrument team will explain it better in the document. 4)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-ALICE-103-CG Dataset: ALL Location: holdings folder (after clicking on “Browse”) Title: Missing mention of "LIN" data product Description: in the file aaareadme.txt there is no mention of the third data product of Alice, probably the most used one (LIN): the “linearized”, resampled, calibrated data (CODMAC level 4). Proposed Solution to Reviewer: Add the description of the LIN data products after SCI data products. Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: ok by team. Editorial, not discussed in afternoon session. 5)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-ALICE-104-CG Dataset: ALL Location: docinfo.txt Title: change name of ALICE_L3_TO_RAYLEIGHS.ASC Description: In docinfo.txt, the document referred to as ALICE_L3_TO_RAYLEIGHS.ASC is in reality ALICE_DATA_TO_RAYLEIGHS.ASC Proposed Solution to Reviewer: Replace in /Document/docinfo.txt ALICE_L3_TO_RAYLEIGHS.ASC with ALICE_DATA_TO_RAYLEIGHS.ASC Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: ok by team in morning session. Editorial, not discussed in afternoon session. 6)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-ALICE-105-CG Dataset: ALL Location: ref.cat Title: update reference list Description: three recent references could be added to the list Proposed Solution to Reviewer: Stern et al. 2015, Feldman et al. 2015, Feaga et al.2015 can be added to the list Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: ok by team in morning session. Editorial, not discussed in afternoon session. 7)Reference ID (RID): ro-c_cal-alice-101-RE Dataset: ro-c_cal-alice-4-esc1-v1.0 Location: document/eaicd_alice_v3.pdf Title: nits in eaicd_alice_v3.PDF Description: " - p.20: In ""DATA_SET_ID = RO--ALI----V<#.#>"" ALI should be ALICE to reflect this and all previous DATA_SET_IDs - p.20: "" is the CODMAC processing level: '2' or '3'"". Add '4'" Proposed Solution to Reviewer: change document Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: RID from Enginiring node at PDS. Not discussed at science meeting