Listed below are the liens/RIDs that were found at the PDS/PSA February 2016 review of the Prelanding thru Escort 1 phases of the Rosetta mission. Even though this particular data set may have not participated in the review, it uses the same pipeline and so the liens likely apply here as well. Please take note that some issues may be resolved, while others are not. If any other issues are discovered please let the PDS-SBN know. It is expected that a fully lien resolved version will be produced during post mission ops and archived with an incremented data set version number. 1)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-RPCMAG-101-NA Dataset: RO-SS-RPCMAG-2-PRL-RAW-V5.0 Location: EAICD Title: Clarification Description: P. 11 description 'Transmission of number of vectors …' could do with rewording / clarification Proposed solution by the Reviewer: Develop a clearer description Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: Presumably accepted 2)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-RPCMAG-102-NA Dataset: RO-SS-RPCMAG-2-PRL-RAW-V5.0 Location: EAICD Title: Clarification Description: P. 12 What are nominal OB / IB sampling rates? Proposed solution by the Reviewer: Refer to appropriate section Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: Presumably accepted 3)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-RPCMAG-103-NA Dataset: RO-SS-RPCMAG-2-PRL-RAW-V5.0 Location: EAICD Title: Clarification Description: P.15 Fig caption - what is PVV? Proposed solution by the Reviewer: Provide info / cross-reference Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: PVV is the validation tool against PDS standard for checks that can be automatized.Accepted 4)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-RPCMAG-104-NA Dataset: RO-SS-RPCMAG-2-PRL-RAW-V5.0 Location: EAICD Title: Query Description: P.17 - HK data contains OB B-field - why is IB not included? Proposed solution by the Reviewer: Discussion at review Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: No changes needed 5)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-RPCMAG-105-NA Dataset: RO-SS-RPCMAG-2-PRL-RAW-V5.0 Location: EAICD Title: Clarification Description: "P. 23: Check understanding - the time for a filtered data sample is the time corresponding to the location of the `centre' coefficient in the filter i.e.\ the point about which the `filter function' (sliding window in time?) is symmetric?" Proposed solution by the Reviewer: Discussion at review Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: Explanation given in the meeting. 6)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-RPCMAG-106-NA Dataset: RO-SS-RPCMAG-2-PRL-RAW-V5.0 Location: EAICD Title: Query Description: P. 28: Why is it non-trivial to convert ground calibration data to PDS format? Proposed solution by the Reviewer: Discussion at review Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: Heritage of a well stablished format, not useful to do the conversion. Rejected. 7)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-RPCMAG-107-NA Dataset: RO-SS-RPCMAG-2-PRL-RAW-V5.0 Location: EAICD Title: Query / Clarify Description: P. 28: Calibration matrices are archived, hence enabling a user to potentially perform their own independent calibration of raw data. Are these calibration matrices updated retrospectively in the archive if necessary - e.g.\ if improved calibration elements become available in the future? in the archive if necessary - e.g.\ if improved calibration elements become available in the future? Maybe that information should also be here? Proposed solution by the Reviewer: Discussion at review, amendment If necessary Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: Presumably accepted 8)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-RPCMAG-108-NA Dataset: RO-SS-RPCMAG-2-PRL-RAW-V5.0 Location: EAICD Title: Clarification Description: 2.2.1: Maybe more detail about why either the flight model or spare model is 'best' for the data calibration for the different sensors? Proposed solution by the Reviewer: Discussion at review, amendment If necessary Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: Accepted. Will add one sentence about this. 9)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-RPCMAG-109-NA Dataset: RO-SS-RPCMAG-2-PRL-RAW-V5.0 Location: EAICD Title: Clarification Description: 2.2.2 specifies that mag.offset removal is not included in calibrated data - what are the plans for this? Will offset files eventually be included in the archive? Over what time scales are there sigificant changes in the offsets? What technique is used to calculate them, usually spacecraft rolls / spins are required? Proposed solution by the Reviewer: Discussion at review, amendment If necessary Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: Explanation given. Not trivial to remove the offset. The team will address when/if possible some of these concerns. Support might be needed. 10)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-RPCMAG-110-NA Dataset: RO-SS-RPCMAG-2-PRL-RAW-V5.0 Location: EAICD Title: Clarification Description: 2.2.3 indicates no software delivered. Any future plans to provide a calibration tool, esp. once mag. offsets - maybe revised from time to time - become available? Proposed solution by the Reviewer: Discussion at review, amendment If necessary Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: It is not required by PDS standard or PSA. It can be added to the Extras directory.No plans of delivering software. Rejected. 11)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-RPCMAG-111-NA Dataset: RO-SS-RPCMAG-2-PRL-RAW-V5.1 Location: EAICD Title: Clarification Description: 2.2.4 DDS2PDS software - is it freely available? Via a web interface? Proposed solution by the Reviewer: Discussion at review, amendment If necessary Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: It is not required by PDS standard or PSA. It can be added to the Extras directory.It is internal. Rejected 12)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-RPCMAG-112-NA Dataset: RO-SS-RPCMAG-2-PRL-RAW-V5.2 Location: EAICD Title: Clarification Description: PP. 36-37: Shouldn't mission phases such as PRL (Prelanding) and ESC1 (Comet Escort) be included? Proposed solution by the Reviewer: Discussion at review, amendment If necessary Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: Accepted. Document to be updated. 13)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-RPCMAG-113-NA Dataset: RO-SS-RPCMAG-2-PRL-RAW-V5.3 Location: EAICD Title: Clarification Description: P. 47: What are the 'plot' quantities referred to in Flag 4,5 item? Proposed solution by the Reviewer: Discussion at review, amendment If necessary Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: Accepted. To be added to the document. 14)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-RPCMAG-114-NA Dataset: RO-SS-RPCMAG-2-PRL-RAW-V5.3 Location: EAICD / .TAB file Title: Clarification of quality flag Description: Quality flags: Most are single zeroes, except for 17 data points during the minute 14:43. LBL file indicates 0/1= good/bad, with each quality bit as `BIT0:X, BIT1:Y,BIT2:Z, BIT3=0:OB, BIT3=1 IB'. Check: In EAICD does the different quality flag description ($\sim$P.44) refer to calibrated data? The EAICD flag is a described as a string of 8 digits, with each digit having a possible value from 0 up to 9 (?) (see 'Other Impacts' digit). Proposed solution by the Reviewer: Discussion at review, amendment If necessary Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: Clarifications given. To be updated the documentation as appropriate. 15)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-RPCMAG-115-NA Dataset: RO-SS-RPCMAG-2-PRL-RAW-V5.3 Location: AAREADME.TXT Title: Typographical / textual corrections Description: "(1) Hybernation (2) FSS abbreviation given without full reference (3) conform the PDS" Proposed solution by the Reviewer: "(1) Hibernation, or is 'Hybernation' acceptable? (2) FSS (First Sequence Science) (3) conform to the PDS" Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: Not discussed 16)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-RPCMAG-116-NA Dataset: RO-SS-RPCMAG-2-PRL-RAW-V5.4 Location: CATINFO.TXT Title: Typographical / textual corrections Description: RCMAG_PERS.CAT Proposed solution by the Reviewer: RPCMAG_PERS.CAT Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: Not discussed 17)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-RPCMAG-117-NA Dataset: RO-SS-RPCMAG-2-PRL-RAW-V5.5 Location: DATASET.CAT Title: Typographical / textual corrections Description: "(1) Given with SW - should it be SS? (2) cases were (3) `not been adapted in the data' in remark on timing (4) In the mode description, does the HK mode record any field vectors? (5) Vernal Equinoxe (6) (PSA)of " Proposed solution by the Reviewer: "(1) Amend if needed (2) cases where (3) `not been corrected in the data' (4) Add information if needed (5) Vernal Equinoxe (6) (PSA) of " Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: Not discussed 18)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-RPCMAG-118-NA Dataset: RO-SS-RPCMAG-2-PRL-RAW-V5.6 Location: EAICD document Title: Typographical / textual corrections Description: "(1) P.40 - gaps in the words 'averaged' and 'convention' (2) P.43 - 'Equinoxe' (3) p.9 'Identifier' (4) P.11 heading 2 (5) P.11 'spacecrafton'" Proposed solution by the Reviewer: "(1) remove gaps (2) `Equinox' (3) 'Needs to be properly alogned (4) 'Dat a'->'Data' (5) spacecrafton -> spacecraft" Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: Not discussed 19)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-RPCMAG-119-NA Dataset: All Location: Documentation Title: ASC not TXT Description: " - P. 9 of RO_IGEP_TR0028_CALPROC document refers to RPCMAG_001_CALIB_FSDPU_FMIB.TXT RPCMAG_001_CALIB_FSDPU_FMOB.TXT. These files are actually archived in the CALIB directory with *.ASC suffix in their names, not *.TXT Solution: Correct the .TXT to .ASC in the document - In addition, the first line of both RPCMAG_001_CALIB_FSDPU_FMIB.ASC and RPCMAG_001_CALIB_FSDPU_FMOB.ASC refers to erroneous file name with *.TXT suffix Solution: Edit the first line of these files and change .TXT to .ASC" Proposed solution by the Reviewer: see description Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: Not discussed 20)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-RPCMAG-101-SPJ Dataset: "ro-c-rpcmag-4-esc1-resampled-v5.0, ro-c-rpcmag-4-prl-resampled-v5.0" Location: calib directory Title: Improve calinfo.txt Description: - P. 9 of RO_IGEP_TR0028_CALPROC document refers to RPCMAG_001_CALIB_FSDPU_FMIB.TXT Proposed solution by the Reviewer: The calinfo.txt should add a note indicating that while numerous calibration files are present, they are a pecularity of the data processing pipeline and that the calibration has been stable. Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: ok. Accepted. The calibration was expected to change but finally did not and all files are identical. This will be documented. 21)Reference ID (RID): RO-AR-RID-RPCMAG-102-SPJ Dataset: All Location: rpcmag_inst.cat, line 743 Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: Not discussed 22)Reference ID (RID): ro-ss-rpcmag-101-RE Dataset: ro-ss-rpcmag-4-prl-resampled-v5.0 Location: document/ies_eaicd/10991-ies-eaicd-01.pdf Title: ro_igep_tr0009_eaicd PDF Description: "sec3.1.2: suggest adding ""PRL"" to list of Mission Phase abbreviations - sec3.4.2: reference to 3.1.3 should be 3.1.2. Add ""PRL"" here as well. - sec3.4.3.2 should be updated for this volume's files in calib/ (missing some)" Proposed solution by the Reviewer: see description Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: RID from Engineering node at PDS. Not discussed in scientific review meeting 23)Reference ID (RID): ro-ss-rpcmag-103-RE Dataset: ro-ss-rpcmag-4-prl-resampled-v5.0 Location: calib/* Title: avoid using OBJECT = TEXT? Description: Every file is a TEXT object, which means their data has no format. Suggest converting these to TABLE objects Proposed solution by the Reviewer: consider Review board discussion outcome and Instrument team response: RID from Engineering node at PDS. Not discussed in scientific review meeting